Wednesday, March 6, 2013

DOW THEN AND NOW (FROM 2007 TO 2013)



Dow at all-time highs surpassing 2007 levels: An interesting "Then and now" comparison.
 
US GDP Growth: Then +2.5%; Now +1.6%

• Consumer Confidence: Then 99.5; Now 69.6

• Total household debt: Then, $13.7 trillion; now, $12.87 trillion.

• 30-year mortgage rate: Then, 6.4 percent; now, 3.51 percent.

• Median existing home price: Then, $206,700; now, $173,600.

• Regular Gas Price: Then $2.75; Now $3.73

• Median household income: Then, $54,489; now, $50,054.

• Inflation rate: Then, 3.5 percent; now, 1.6 percent.

• Misery index: Then, 7.5; now, 9.5

 • Americans Unemployed (in Labor Force): Then 6.7 million; Now 13.2 million

• Unemployment rate: Then, 4.7 percent; now, 7.9 percent.

• Labor force participation: Then, 65.8 percent; now, 63.6 percent.

• Americans On Food Stamps: Then 26.9 million; Now 47.69 million

 • Size of Fed's Balance Sheet: Then $0.89 trillion; Now $3.01 trillion

• US Debt as a Percentage of GDP: Then ~38%; Now 74.2%

• Total US Debt Outstanding: Then $9.008 trillion; Now $16.43 trillion

• Federal budget deficit: Then, $162 billion; now, $1.09 trillion.

 • U.S. corporate profits: Then, $1.46; now, $1.97 trillion.

 • S&P Rating of the US: Then AAA; Now AA+

• VIX: Then 17.5%; Now 14%

• 10 Year Treasury Yield: Then 4.64%; Now 1.89%

 • EURUSD: Then 1.4145; Now 1.3050

• USDJPY: Then 117; Now 93

• Gold: Then $748; Now $1583

• Crude oil per barrel: Then, $80.26; now, $90.87.

• Regular Gasoline Price: Then $2.75; Now $3.73

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Ten Nations That Control the World’s Gold

Gold’s substantial rise in price should speak for itself. In dollar terms, gold returned 11.1% in the third quarter and was up by 16% year to date through the end of the quarter. The World Gold Council said that gold has a low stock market correlation through time. That was not the case in the third quarter. Gold still outperformed almost all the major equity markets in the largest gold-holding nations in 2012. 24/7 Wall St. analyzed how the gold rankings compare to each major nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) and how those figures compare to the top 10 holders of gold. What is surprising in some cases is how countries with the largest GDP are not necessarily the largest holders of gold. Two small nations, the Netherlands and Switzerland, are major holders of gold. Under the terms of the Central Bank Gold Agreement among major European states, many countries are supposed to be selling gold but are not.
The United Kingdom’s $2.43 trillion in GDP is the world’s seventh largest, but its gold holdings of 310.3 tonnes rank only 17th in the world and account for only 15.9% of its total foreign reserves. Does the old term “pound sterling” mean that the British banks really care more about silver? Another standout exception is Brazil, which has tiny gold reserves compared to its GDP. Its $2.5 trillion in GDP ranks sixth in the world, yet it holds only 33.6 tonnes of gold, or 0.5% of foreign reserves. Brazil ranks a surprising 52nd in the world among gold holders.
The International Monetary Fund is the third-largest official holder of gold, with more than 2,814 tonnes. The European Central Bank ranks right behind India, with 502.1 tonnes and 32.3% of its total foreign reserves held in gold. Central bank buying of gold was recently undertaken by Russia, Turkey, Ukraine and the Kyrgyz Republic. Turkey went as far as raising the gold reserve requirements for its commercial banks.
The World Gold Council report shows low borrowing costs and the support of financial markets spur gold accumulation. Gold is no longer just an inflation hedge; it is the key protection against a global race to devalue currencies, even if consumer prices are somewhat stable. Bonds pay historically low rates and stock market volatility has spooked many investors, so gold is becoming the true safe haven.
Major central banks are growing their balance sheets by purchasing trillions of dollars in paper assets. The World Gold Council said that research showed that a 1% change in money supply, six months prior, in the United States, Europe, India and Turkey tends to increase the price of gold by 0.9%, 0.5%, 0.7% and 0.05%, respectively. The Council also said that inflation is still several years off and many central banks have been more worried about deflation. Investors would be well advised to heed a warning from bond king Bill Gross, who told global investors to have exposure to hard assets, which will rise in value with inflation.
24/7 Wall St. has listed the 10 nations with the largest gold reserves, along with the percentage of total foreign reserves held in gold, each nation’s 2011 GDP and how it ranks in the world, and the local stock market performance. We have added analysis about how the potential unraveling of the euro could play into the future buying or selling of gold by European nations. For nations outside Europe, we have provided some historical context and predicted the path that their central banks are likely to follow in the years ahead.
 
10) India
> Gold reserves: 557.7 tonnes
> Pct. of total foreign reserves: 10.0%
> GDP: $1.82 trillion (10th highest)
 
While India ranks 11th on the World Gold Council list, it is 10th if you remove the International Monetary Fund. India has been a steady buyer of gold over time. That is likely to continue as the government needs to support its currency, even if the economy is volatile. India became an aggressive buyer in 2009, when it spent almost $7 billion to buy 200 tonnes of gold, which the IMF sold to raise capital. For the economy to support 1.2 billion people, the central bank must hold gold and hard assets. The Indian population is a large consumer of gold for jewelry and there is high demand for the precious metal to store wealth. India will thus continue to buy gold in the years ahead.
 
9) Netherlands
> Gold reserves: 612.5 tonnes
> Pct. of total foreign reserves: 59.8%
> GDP: $838 billion (17th highest)
 
It is surprising that the Netherlands has so much gold. But it is also important to recall that the country is a former colonial power and has a long history as a very wealthy nation. Its population of 16.7 million ranks 63rd among all nations, while its GDP is the 17th largest in the world. As with some European nations, the Netherlands did not sell all the gold provided for by the Central Bank Gold Agreement. Now that the Netherlands is under some of the same pressure as many other European nations, it is unlikely to be a big seller of gold. It may need that gold to protect itself if the euro comes unraveled.
 
8) Japan
> Gold reserves: 765.2 tonnes
> Pct. of total foreign reserves: 3.2%
> GDP: $5.86 trillion (3rd highest)
 
Japan has to hold large amounts of gold. The Bank of Japan has held interest rates at almost zero for about two decades. It recently sold gold so that it could pump about $200 billion worth of yen into the economy as stimulus after the tsunami and nuclear disaster threatened to send Japan back into recession. At some point in the future, Japan may need to buy that gold back to support its large monetary base. Until then, the yen remains one of the stronger global currencies, which makes exports more expensive. Japan’s population of 127 million is aging rapidly and birth rates are extremely low.
 
7) Russia
> Gold reserves: 936.7 tonnes
> Pct. of total foreign reserves: 9.6%
> GDP: $1.85 trillion (9th highest)
 
Russia continues to buy gold as its global economic ambitions grow. A previous 24/7 Wall St. analysis showed that Russia’s reserves were 784 tonnes in early 2011 after it bought 120 tonnes in the first 10 months of 2010, more than 100 tonnes in 2009 and close to 70 tonnes in 2007. The World Gold Council reported that Russia has added more gold, so that reserves likely will rise yet again. Russia is extremely wealthy in natural resources, and president Vladimir Putin and his allies want it to become more of an economic superpower. With a population of 142 million and Russia’s GDP of $1.85 trillion, its holdings of gold are likely to surge.
 
6) Switzerland
> Gold reserves: 1,040.1 tonnes
> Pct. of total foreign reserves: 11.5%
> GDP: $660 billion (19th highest)
 
Switzerland is the world’s private banker and so must be a top holder of gold. Still, it is amazing to consider that its population is barely 7.9 million and it ranks 95th in the world for population. Also, its dollar-adjusted GDP of $660 billion ranks only 19th. Switzerland sold gold from 2003 to 2008, right before the huge run up in gold prices. If Switzerland needs to devalue its currency to remain competitive, it can always sell more gold. Unless global banking disappears entirely, the Swiss will remain one of the largest holders of gold in the generations ahead.
 
5) China
> Gold reserves: 1,054.1 tonnes
> Pct. of total foreign reserves: 1.7%
> GDP: $7.3 trillion (2nd largest)
 
China’s economy has stumbled to the point that its official growth rate of 7.4% in the third quarter may feel like a recession. China has the ambition of becoming the largest economy in the world. It already is considered the world’s manufacturer. China must have hard assets along with its U.S. Treasury bond holdings to keep its currency pegged to the U.S. dollar. It has the world’s largest population, with more than 1.3 billion people, yet its GDP of almost $7.3 trillion is still not even half that of the United States. Whenever the yuan truly floats, China will have to have more hard assets and more transparent economic readings to support it. China added some 454 tonnes of gold between 2003 and 2009. When it finally adjusts its official gold holdings in the coming months, they are likely to be higher again.
 
4) France
> Gold reserves: 2,435.4 tonnes
> Pct. of total foreign reserves: 71.6%
> GDP: $2.77 trillion (5th largest)
 
France finds itself in an interesting position. Socialist president Francois Hollande is on a quest against many of the austerity measures implemented by his predecessor, Nicolas Sarkozy. France does not want to lose its “second-best economy” status in the eurozone, behind Germany. It will have to pay for the new economic measures and this poses a particular problem because the extremely wealthy, who are being targeted for high taxes, may continue to leave the country. France may ultimately need to sell gold. Although it is part of the Central Bank Gold Agreement as a gold seller, it may need a cushion in case the euro faces an outright breakup.
 
3) Italy
> Gold reserves: 2,451.8 tonnes
> Pct. of total foreign reserves: 72.0%
> GDP: $2.2 trillion (8th largest)
 
Italy is a financially troubled nation, and it is truly too big to bail out. By many measures it is the greatest economic risk to the rest of Europe and the balance of the major world economies. Italy’s 61 million population ranks 23rd in the world, but its dollar-adjusted GDP of almost $2.2 trillion ranks it as the 8th largest economy. The Italian government was also part of the Central Bank Gold Agreement, but there is a real conundrum now. Italy could sell gold to raise capital, but then it would lose its cushion if the euro unravels. It is almost impossible to imagine that Italy would be a buyer of gold because it has too many pensioners and benefits to pay for as is.
 
2) Germany
> Gold reserves: 3,395.5 tonnes
> Pct. of total foreign reserves: 72.4% of foreign reserves
> GDP: $3.6 trillion (4th largest)
 
Despite forced gold sales from ECB nations in the past, Germany likely has to maintain its underlying asset base as it is the anchor of the euro. The euro after all, is a watered-down version of the Deutsche mark. Germany’s population of 81 million ranks 16th in the world, but its $3.6 trillion adjusted GDP ranks fourth. What could happen if Germany started accelerated gold sales to buy up even more paper assets from the PIIGS (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain) and more paper assets of their banks? The initial reaction might be positive for the eurozone economies. However, Angela Merkel and her successors might be left with high inflation without hard assets as a cushion. Germany is supposed to be a gold seller under the Central Bank Gold Agreement, but it is likely to hold what it can as a buffer in case the euro breaks up or in case it needs to raise quick bailout cash for the PIIGS.
 
1) United States
> Gold reserves: 8,133.5 tonnes
> Pct. of total foreign reserves: 75.4%
> GDP: $15 trillion in GDP (the largest)
 
It should be no surprise that the U.S. is the largest holder of gold as the dollar is the global reserve currency and the U.S. has by far the largest GDP of any nation. The growth of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet can only be sustained without dire consequences if it is backed by hard assets like gold. Imagine if the conspiracy theorists are right and that Fort Knox and other repositories do not have gold in them. It is this gold, the massive U.S. GDP and America’s underlying wealth of natural resources that keep the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. If the World Gold Council is right in its assessments of inflation and gold, then the U.S. is likely to hold its reserve currency status for quite some time, even if credit rating agencies continue to downgrade the country.

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

MORE PAIN FOR INDIAN BANKS AHEAD

CRISIL believes that loans restructured by Indian banks may increase sharply to Rs.3.25 lakh crore between 2011-12 and 2012-13, against the earlier estimate of Rs.2 lakh crore. Loans of Rs.1.6 lakh crore have already been restructured in 2011-12 and in the first quarter of 2012-13. The majority of restructuring will be in loans to the state power utilities (SPUs), and the construction and infrastructure sectors. The rise is a result of significantly higher funding challenges being faced by companies with large debt.

In recent months, availability of unsecured short-term loans from Indian banks has diminished. This is exacerbating refinancing and liquidity pressure, especially for the SPUs. This will lead to a significant increase in restructuring of SPU loans to nearly Rs.1.5 trillion. So far, SPU loans of Rs.0.6 lakh crore have been restructured. Furthermore, inability to raise adequate equity in a timely manner is straining the balance sheets and financial flexibility of developers in infrastructure and construction sectors, resulting in an increased likelihood of restructuring. Other vulnerable sectors include iron and steel, textiles, and engineering.

The proportion of restructured loans in this period will be high at around 5.7 per cent of banks’ advances as on March 31, 2013 according to CRISIL. Around Rs.0.50 lakh crore of these restructured loans may slip into NPAs, though this will depend on the terms of restructuring and fundamental viability of the projects and the companies. These slippages can aggravate the already stressed asset quality of banks by further increasing NPAs by 50 to 75 basis
points beyond March 2013. The loans to SPUs are unlikely to slip into NPAs, given the support expected from state and central governments.

Despite continued weak growth and profitability in the corporate sector, the large restructuring will help limit the increase in the banks’ NPAs in the near term. According to CRISIL’s estimates, the lower GDP growth of 5.5 per cent expected in 2012-13 may result in increase in banks’ gross NPAs to 3.5 per cent by end-March 2013 from around 3.0 per cent at the end of June 2012. The increase will be driven largely by delinquencies in the micro, small and medium enterprises, and agriculture and allied sectors.

An Economy is only as good as its statistica​l system

The government will announce the first quarter gross domestic product (GDP) numbers on Friday, and speculation is running high whether growth will be lower than the 5.3% notched up in the January-March 2012 quarter. What is very interesting is that in the meantime, the government has, rather quietly, revised downwards earlier GDP estimates for fiscal years 2009 and 2010.Recall that when GDP growth slipped to 5.3% in the January-March 2012 quarter, there was much adverse commentary about it being even lower than growth during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2009 (FY09), after the Lehman Brothers crisis. That didn’t reflect too well on the government, because while the lower growth in FY09 was the result of a global crisis, the current slowdown is largely a home-grown one.Well, growth in the fourth quarter of FY09 has now been revised downwards by the Central Statistics Office (CSO) from the earlier 5.9% to a much lower 3.5%. Gaurav Kapur, a senior economist at Royal Bank of Scotland NV in Mumbai, pointed out the revisions and drew attention to its magnitude. It’s a huge revision and once again calls into question the quality of data on which the GDP estimates are based.The CSO website says that the new series of the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) has been used for computing the data. But strangely enough, there’s been no revision in the GDP growth for the third quarter of FY09, which remains at 5.8%. The revised IIP data seems to have changed the GDP growth for the fourth quarter of FY09, but not for the third quarter.As the chart shows, growth for the first quarter of FY10 has also been revised down from 6.3% to 5.7%. That’s not such a big change, though, compared with some of the other revisions. Consider, for instance, the revisions for the first quarter of FY09 from 7.9% to 9.8%, or for the fourth quarter of FY10 from 9.4% to 11.2%.What was the reason for the big change during the fourth quarter of FY09? Well, they’ve revised down the growth rates in all three sectors—agriculture, industry and services. Growth in industry has been revised down from 0.8% to -3.6%.When the GDP growth numbers for the first quarter of FY13 are announced on Friday, if it falls below the 5.3% recorded during the previous quarter, as several economists believe it will, even then the growth rate won’t be lower than during the post-Lehman period. As an economist pointed out, we can now say that growth isn’t as bad as in the post-Lehman quarters, at least until the numbers are revised again.More importantly, when they announce the GDP growth numbers on Friday, where’s the guarantee it won’t be revised later by more than 2 percentage points, just as they did for the fourth quarter of FY09? And if the magnitude of error is so high, what’s the point of taking any decisions based on this kind of data? One can only express one’s sympathies to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Simply put, the credibility of the GDP data is at stake.

Rural Indians outpace urbanites in spending growth


For the first time since economic reforms began two decades ago, consumption in rural India is
growing faster than in urban India. Given the large size of India’s rural population, the value of goods
and services consumed has always been greater in rural India, but urban India had narrowed the
differential during most of the last decade by growing at a faster pace. Between 2009-10 and 2011-
12, additional spending by rural India was Rs.3,750 billion, significantly higher than Rs.2,994 billion
by urbanites. For sustaining the rural boom, it is critical to substitute short-term income boosters such as government-sponsored employment guarantee schemes with durable job opportunities in rural areas.

Growth in rural consumption was fuelled by a rise in household incomes due to greater non-farm job
opportunities and government initiated employment generation schemes. NSSO data shows that
during 2004-05 to 2009-10 rural construction jobs rose by 88 per cent, while the number of people
employed in agriculture fell from 249 million to 229 million. In addition, migrants from villages to urban
areas who benefitted from job opportunities in infrastructure and construction projects increased
remittances to their families in rural India, which boosted consumption.

A notable phenomenon in rural consumption is a shift from necessities to discretionary goods. About
one in every two rural households now has a mobile phone. Even in India’s poorest states such as
Bihar and Orissa, one in three rural households has a mobile phone. Nearly 42 per cent of rural
households owned a television in 2009-10, up from 26 per cent five years earlier. Similarly, 14 per
cent of rural households had a two-wheeler in 2009-10, twice that in 2004-05. For India, a young
population, rising income and low penetration of many consumer durables means that rural
consumption has the potential to remain an important source of demand.

The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) fuelled job
creation on an unprecedented scale and provided an opportunity to rural households to supplement
their traditional farm income. Nearly 27 per cent of rural households availed employment under
MGNREGS in 2009-10. Wages under MGNREGS increase with retail inflation: consequently, rural
wages have risen faster than inflation since 2007-08.

Source: CRISIL

Monday, August 27, 2012

Five Reasons Ayn Rand Is Bad for Business


For decades, CEOs have touted Ayn Rand as a "must-read" for staff and employees alike. Here are five good reasons that's a bad idea — if you want your business to be successful.

1. Rand focuses employees on money. Rand practically worshipped the almighty dollar  seeing the acquisition of wealth as a goal worthy in and of itself. Unfortunately, when that attitude spreads throughout an organization, a higher salary becomes the only motivation that really works. That means top workers will, of course, leave the moment they get a better offer elsewhere.

2. Rand encourages selfishness. For Rand, there is no higher good than pursuing one's own happiness. The problem with that philosophy is that it encourages workers to view their personal success as being far more important than the group's success — and that kind of self-centered thinking is fatal to getting team members to work together.

3. Rand creates fanatics. While some Rand fans have a nuanced view of her, there are plenty of people who glom onto her writing with evangelical intensity. Their quest to convince everyone else in the workplace that Rand was the greatest thinker and philosopher of the 20th century (or maybe of all time) is distracting, annoying and counter-productive.

4. Rand alienates the religious. Rand's value system is the antithesis of Judeo-Christian teaching. For example, while Jesus says "blessed are the poor," Rand calls them "moochers." Top-quality workers who value their religious faith might feel out of place in a work environment that seeks to canonize Rand's brand of atheism.

5. Rand discourages charitable giving.Rand devotees criticize CEOs who give to charity because "you have no moral obligation to 'give back,' because you didn't take anything in the first place." For many workers, though, an altruistic desire to "give back" is a strong motivator. Such workers respect leaders who know that others contributed to their success.

Source: Reports

Friday, August 24, 2012

IDBI PAVES THE WAY FOR MORE SGD BOND ISSUANCES

IDBI Bank made the first publicly listed benchmark Singapore Dollar bond issue from India on August 21, 2012.  The transaction received overwhelming response and the order book was oversubscribed by 12 times.  The SGD 250 million bond issue is for a 3 year maturity and carries a fixed coupon of 3.65% p.a. This landmark issue by IDBI Bank will pave the way for other SGD bond issuances by Indian issuers.
This transaction is significant to India and IDBI Bank on several counts:
i) It is the first benchmark public bond transaction by any Indian entity in the Singapore Dollar bond market.
ii) It has opened up a new source of funding and investor diversification for Indian issuers.
iii) IDBI Bank is the only issuer from India to have tapped the Dim Sum (CNH) and Singapore Dollar (SGD) bond markets and is the only bank from India to have accessed the Swiss Franc (CHF) Bond Market in FY 2013.
iv) The transaction received a record oversubscription of 12 times which is the highest for any Indian bank.
v) The issue achieved the tightest pricing for any benchmark 3 year senior bond issue by any bank in the SGD market during 2012 year till date.
IDBI Bank undertook road shows in Singapore on August 14 and 15, 2012 which were very well attended by a diverse set of SGD focused private banks, asset managers and banks who were eager to hear the India and IDBI Bank story.  The highly impressive and well received road shows led to some large accounts indicating initial interest in an issuance and IDBI Bank decided to capitalize on the same despite significant volatility in global credit markets. 
The transaction was announced in the morning of August 21, 2012 as a SGD benchmark 3 year bond in the 4% area.  The books grew rapidly and soared to over SGD 1 billion within 2 hours of opening.  This enabled the announcement of a significantly tighter final guidance of 3.70% area post lunch in Singapore.  The book continued to grow to over SGD 3 billion, allowing the final pricing outcome of 3.65% at the tight end of the
final price guidance.  This price tightening of 35 bps from the initial price guidance is unprecedented.
The transaction attracted interest from a diversified array of investors including private banks (65%), asset managers (17%) and banks (18%).  Around 78% of the book size came from Singapore, with the balance 22% being from Hongkong and other geographies. 
DBS Bank, HSBC Bank and Standard Chartered Bank acted as Joint Book Runners and Lead Managers to the transaction.